Ini adalah persoalan yang ditimbulkan oleh laman blog ini: Adakah Syed Akbar Ali tidak didakwa sungguhpun mengatakan Arab Islam itu membodohkan kita dengan meletakkan batu - untuk disembah dan tindakan sembahyang - menonggeng dalam punggung lima hari sekali tidak bercanggah dan perlu didakwa.
Dari : harismibrahim.wordpress.com
Isu ini bermula dengan kenyataan media www.themalaysiainsider.com yang melaporkan bahawa Najib Tun Abdul Razak yang mengatakan bahawa Pengerusi BERSIH 2.0 Ambiga adalah individu yang mengugut dan mencabar Islam.
Dikatakan menghina Islam tetapi di gugurkan
Syed Akbar Ali - malaysiabloghouse
Atas kenyataan itu laman www.harisibrahim.wordpress.com telah mengeluarkan berita mengenai orang yang rapat dengan Perdana Menteri Malaysia dan juga merupakan orang yang dilantik menjadi ahli lembaga Suruhan Jaya Pencegahan Rasuah dan merupakan blogger yang menerajui http://www.bloghousemalaysia.com/ himpunan blogger pro kerajaan yang menghina Islam dan membandingkan beliau dengan Ambiga.
Menurut laman Haris Ibrahim – Syed Akbar Ali pernah dituduh mengeluarkan kenyataan yang bercanggah dengan Islam. Laman itu turut mempersoalkan kenapa tuduhan ke atas Syed Akbar Ali digugurkan sedangkan tuduhan beliau adalah serius :
Berikut adalah kertas pertuduhan yang dibuat. Akhirnya dikatakan ia digugurkan. Kenapa di gugurkan? Adakah ini perkara ringan – kalau Ambiga pesimistik terhadap Islam – apa pula Syed Akhbar yang Islam tetapi mencerca Islam itu sendiri.
Penulis blog yang dikatakan rapat dengan Najib secara terang dikatakan menghina Islam dengan kenyataan menyembah batu – dilihat sebagai Kaabah dan kritikan beliau terhadap sembahyang yang mengatakan kita kena menonggeng lima kali sehari untuk sembahyang.
Ini bukan persoalan BERSIH tetapi kalau Syed Akbar Ali menghina agama, beliau harus di sekat kerana beliau mungkin lebih buruk dari Ambiga. Baca laman itu dan lihat bagaimana kes yang menghina orang Arab dan agama Islam digugurkan. Adakah dakwaan ini benar – atau cuba langkah politik semasa yang mahu menjatuhkan kredibiliti agama dan Kaabah itu sendiri. Baca dan lihat apa yang tersenarai dalam laman web www.harisibrahim.wordpress.com - umno-reform2
Najib, is your AG anti-Islam? Does your administration condone the vilification of Islam?
July 3, 2011
Malaysianinsider reported yesterday that, whilst speaking to a large crowd in Pasir Putih, Kelantan, Najib said that BERSIH 2.0 chairperson Ambiga was ‘the one who threatened Islam’.No elaboration on when and how she is supposed to have made the threat.
A vile and unsubstantiated allegation.
I’ve known Ambiga for over a decade now and have known her to always be most respectful of all faiths and beliefs, without exception.
I’m not alone. Many members of the Bar will bear testimony to this.
Perhaps Najib should desist in unsubstantiated attacks against Ambiga and explain why charges of sedition for a most vile and filthy attack on the faith of the Malays in this country by Syeditious Akbar ali were dropped by the Attorney General’s chambers.
The charge sheet, in PDF, is linked below again for your ease of reference.
You will note that it is dated 6th May, 2008 and signed by DPP Mohamed Hanafiah bin Zakaria, the same day, according to Syeditious post dated 18th October, 2010, that he was charged in court.
It is fair to assume that someone in the AG’s chambers had, before Syeditious was charged, scrutinized the investigation papers submitted by the police authorities and had formed the view that Syeditious comments were indeed seditious and warranted the preferring of charges.
Hence the charges in court on 6th May, 2008 upon the terms as appear in the charge sheet.
And I cannot imagine that anyone who has since read the full tenor of Syeditious comments, however much they disliked the sedition laws, would argue that he did not deserve to be charged for such an insensitive and hateful attack.
In my related post yesterday, I had shared how, after Syeditious had received advise of legal counsel, he had asked that no moves be made to raise techncal objections until he gave further instructions, and when those instructions finally came, it was that no such technical objections were to be taken as the case against him would be dropped.
As Syeditious had predicted, the charges were subsequently dropped.
Who approved the dropping of those charges?
Was it the AG?
If so, does this mean the AG shares the view of Syeditious, that ‘the case was nothing’?
Does Najib agree that the charges were properly dropped, and that ‘the case was nothing’?
How did Syeditious know that the charges would be dropped?
Did Syeditious offer any inducement to secure the abandonment of those charges against him?
Should MACC investigate if corrupt practices were involved in the decision to drop those charges and, if so, should not Syeditious resign from the Anti-Corruption Advisory Panel?
Given his vile and disgusting attack on the beliefs of the Malays in this country, which make the episode of the Danish cartoons of the Holy Prophet (pbuh) pale in comparison, should he not be removed from that public office?
Najib, could we have some credible answers to these burning questions, please?
No comments:
Post a Comment